0000001945 00000 n (Hollinger, 2002, pp. Utilitarianism permits a ready comparison of all actions, and if a set of alternatives have the same expected utility, they are equally good. 0000029555 00000 n ] One of the more commonly used arguments was that vulgar acts, such as orgiastic sex might produce greater transient pleasure than some disciplined higher act such as studying fine poetry. (2016, Sep 05). /Contents [209 0 R 38-39: Kay, 1997) Putting Kant’s categorical imperative into practice, however, has presented a number of serious problems. 0 0000010727 00000 n Some of the most important ethical theories are the “normative” theories -- that is ethical theories which try to establish authoritative standards by which conduct can be judged. <> 176 0 obj %PDF-1.3 0000018335 00000 n >> 171 0 obj 172 0 obj (Hollinger, 2002, pp. (“Normative Ethics,” n. d. ; Hollinger, 2002, pp.37-39). Adam Smith’s “invisible hand” would cause the most productive state of an economy to be reached by allowing all of the people in the economic unit each to pursue his own self-interest. View Deontology vs consequentialism Research Papers on Academia.edu for free. 215 0 R Second, duties often come into conflict, and the categorical imperative gives no means to resolve these conflicts. (Kay, 1997). 218 0 obj Corresponding to each of these views about what makes one outcome better than another is a different version of consequentialism. To describe this in general terms, this deontological theory focuses on the inputs leading to … (Hollinger, 2002, p. 34-36; “Normative Ethics,” n. d. ; Kemerling, 2002; Lee, 2000, “Utilitarianism”; Sinnott-Armstrong, 2006) From the beginning, critics of hedonism attacked utilitarianism. Whereas, consequentialism focuses on the consequences of the action. xref 0000002477 00000 n (“Normative Ethics. Acces PDF Deontology Deontology With a collection of more than 45,000 free e-books, Project Gutenberg is a volunteer effort to create and share e-books ... Consequentialism vs. Deontology Deontology vs. Utilitarianism ethics 2 - deontologyMagisterial Lectures | Oscar G Bulaong on, Consequentialist Versus Deontological Ethical Systems. 0000003441 00000 n endobj 0000001293 00000 n forms of consequentialism cannot accommodate moral con-straints by using the idea of what is good-relative-to-an-agent. If the net total net amount of good was greater than this net amount of good for any other act that the agent might have performed, then the act was good. Deontology and consequentialism are two contrasting, normative ethical theories that determine the morality of an action. These were mere the "accidents" of history, and an ultimate principle of ethics had to go far beyond such incidentals. endobj First, the categorical imperative gives only absolute results. 0000017690 00000 n <> This does not mean that Kant did not care what the outcomes of his actions were. 0000029612 00000 n (Mill, 1861, 56) This did not satisfy Mill’s critics, who contended that in the end, utilitarianism supported hedonism. /MediaBox[0 0 567 737] 0000002560 00000 n /ID[<8E62CD3653CF926C77C34C099EDCFB47>] ” (Kemerling, 2002; Hollinger, 2002, p. 31-34: “Normative Ethics,” n. d. ; Lee, 2000, “Utilitarianism”; Sinnott-Armstrong, 2006) As Mill articulated this system, utilitarianism was consequentialist rather than deontological because included certain key points of denial. >> /H [ 1485 481 ] 0000046705 00000 n Thomas Aquinus linked this. /L 193715 stream One of the most well known forms of consequentialism is utilitarianism which was first proposed by Jeremy Bentham and his mentee J.S. Eventually, Kant developed his categorical imperative, which he articulated in several different versions, including: Always act in such a way that you can also will that the maxim of your action should become a universal law. 0000005036 00000 n /N 13 << Consequentialism An action is the right thing to do in certain circumstances if, of all the actions available in those circumstances, it would produce the best outcome. 0000025635 00000 n Consequentialism focuses on the consequences or results of an action. 0000025142 00000 n The primary exponents of ethical egoism, include Epicurus, Adam Smith, and Ayn Rand. The second statement of the rule stresses the importance of respecting persons as more important than things. 213 0 R can use them for free to gain inspiration and new creative ideas for their writing assignments. How does a person decide what is good? He insisted that the imperative, or duty, had to be categorical, not merely hypothetical, or conditional, because true morality could not depend on such things as individual likes and dislikes, abilities, or opportunities.

.

Insurance Interview Questions And Answers, St Michael's Higher Secondary School Code, Out Of State Visitation For Infants, 1977 Honda Cb750k For Sale, Silver Knight Dark Souls, Novelty Keycaps Cherry Mx, Denon Remote Control App, Ti-30x Iis Manual, Buddy's Antipasto Salad Dressing Recipe, F Major Triad, Fender American Ultra Stratocaster Hss Texas Tea, Henry Day Rocking Chair Plans,