My choice was to buy both. The video really sold me and exposed the SM57 a little bit, especially that whole boxiness factor which you can really get a sense of. The i5 was picked as one of the "Five Great Mics Under $200"in About.Com Home Recording (Part of the New York Times Company) He states: "If you've got right around $100 to purchase one mic for your studio, the Audix i5 should be it. Blue Yeti vs. AT2020 vs. Samson C01 [Definitive Guide], Philips SHP9500 vs. AKG K702 vs. HIFIMAN DEVA. The i5 is more natural sounding and less compressed than the SM57. Your email address will not be published. His sense of humour, coupled with a knack for excellence and strict attention to detail are what allow him to stand out in a crowded industry.”, Topping E30/L30 vs. iFi Zen CAN Signature 6XX, Tonor TC-777 USB Condenser Microphone Review & Shootout, FiiO BTR3K vs. BTR5 vs. DragonFly Red [Which Is Best For YOU?!]. The mic must be directly in front of your mouth for best sound. Subscribe here for more awesome demos: http://goo.gl/PpRpA2 Comparison between these two dynamic microphones. So yeah it’s said to be even more durable than the SM57. Your email address will not be published. The price of this microphone is quite similar to that of the sm57. It’s got more presence, better clarity, a better low end, and just an all around sizzle that’s hard to beat. For a long time I mic'ed amps with the SM57 as per the usual. The i5 has a higher dB output with a slight boost at 150Hz. Picks up all the subtle details. Just sold SM57 to a friend. Used for micing guitar amps and acoustic bluegrass mandolin. His sense of humour, coupled with a knack for excellence and strict attention to detail are what allow him to stand out in an crowded industry. SM57 is more common, so should yours break, you're more likely to get a quick replacement on shorter notice. The 57 is still a great mic no doubt, but the i5 outshines it just a bit. Crispness and clarity. And I've only used the I5 a few times just to get a feel for it. The SM57 sounds slightly muddier and boxier than the i5. Thanks for stopping by! The typical price you'll find the i5 sold for is not dissimilar to that of Shure's SM57, which has been something of an industry standard in this area for longer than most of us care to remember. A perfect mic for drums, guitar amps, horns, and most anything else, the Audix i5 can do it all." I eventually read about a guy who went into Guitar Center to pick up an SM57. Comments? If so, we hope you will register now and join our community! Hope this helps make up your mind :) I think the SM57 is more natural sounding, but the I5 does have more edge/bite so it's probably useful on distorted guitars or snares. Both are dynamic microphones that excel in many of the same situations – especially for guitar cabinets and snare drums. Nice man! SM57 vs Audix I5 into Sapphire Pro 40 / FLAC / Acoustic Guitar. Audix i5. One of the complaints with the 57 is of mic placement; it has to be near perfect, with a lot of experimentation. Hi Stu, I’ve had both SM57 and i5 Mics. Used that ever since my A/B home test. . Registration is free and easy. The I5 is the second one in the example. I have several i5's and a couple of SM57's. It was obviously preferable (for my application) over the Shure. In his spare time, he likes to fish, paint, play guitar, pray, rap, make beats, take photos, record videos, graphic design, and more. I lean toward the i5's, they just sound better on a recording to me (JMHO). In his spare time, he likes to fish, paint, play guitar, pray, rap, make beats, take photos, record videos, graphic design, and more. Live vocals (wouldn’t really recommend it for studio vocal takes). Don’t put the mic too close to your amp, or you won’t get the right sound and it will become too punchy. Can handle high SPL (sound pressure level). In theory the I5 is better, but I've never used an SM57 to make that comparison myself. Because the i5 is smaller, it’s easier to fit into tight spaces that may be otherwise cumbersome for the SM57. Please let me know down below or Contact me!! Home Studio Guide – Part I (Introduction), The Best Audiophile Headphones [Complete Buyer’s Guide], The Best Audiophile Headphones (Part II) [Complete Buyer’s Guide], The Best Audiophile Headphones (Part III) [Complete Buyer’s Guide], The Best Audiophile Headphones (Part IV) [Complete Buyer’s Guide], The 5 Best Audiophile Headphones For Under $500, The Best Headphones for Gaming [In Depth Guide]. SEE THE AUDIX i5 FOR YOURSELF ON AMAZON!! Requests? window.dojoRequire(["mojo/signup-forms/Loader"], function(L) { L.start({"baseUrl":"mc.us19.list-manage.com","uuid":"0573ad2c5093a15ee16bc49c5","lid":"f49b0eb597","uniqueMethods":true}) }). This baby needs a good preamp and interface or mixer. The low end of the i5 is punchier than the 57. The tone with snare is more mid-range heavy and dense than the Sm57. The frequency response of the i5 provides more clarity than the 57. The SM57 may be better for clean and sparkly Fender sounds, while the i5 excels in Marshall style distorted sounds. Before we get into the Audix i5 vs. SM57 comparison, grab a snack, sit back and relax because.. Today I will outline the Audix i5 and then compare it with the SM57 towards the end. That being the case, Audix's expectations of this mic must be high, as you can only sell against such a successful brand by being cheaper, better or different in a way that is useful. An extremely versatile mic with a phenomenal crispness and clarity. Stu is determined to help you make sound decisions, and strives to deliver the best and most in depth content on the internet! Both of these mics are slightly different. At it’s best with snares and guitar cabinets. However, I bought an Audix i5 to eventually test on snare, but gave it a spin on my amp. Amazing on snares and guitar cabinets. Versatile. To put it bluntly, nearly everything I’ve read says go for the i5 over the 57. Now without further ado, let’s get rolling!! One said it was actually not as good as an Sm57 for recording guitar cabinets. Mogami cables are recommended with the i5. Captures the Marshall DSL40C amp with ease, and especially good with the low mids and detailed highs. So in my research, I kept reading about how much better the i5 is than the SM57 for nearly everything. Physically the i5 doesn’t fail but is design is pretty basic. The mic for guitar amps and snare drums. Size & Shape. Another endorsement for the i5. The head of the i5 is not quite as delicate as the 57. Final Word. After all, the57 has been around since about 1965. The i5 has a more forgiving proximity effect than the SM57. Of course there were a few people who stuck by the 57 (It is still a great mic), but I was a bit skeptical myself. Mic shootout: Audix i5 vs. Shure SM57; Are you a heavy metal guitar player, collector or enthusiast? Or if you need to resale it, turnaround time would likely be quicker. Yeah I would go with the Audix i5. Overall people are saying it does perform better for snares as well as guitar amps and cabinets. It’s a good compliment to the SM57 when miking an amp especially. With driven sounds, I found the Shure to be fizzy and almost always felt the need to EQ the guitar tracks during tracking. It’s not as likely to crack with the hit of an accidental flailing drumstick (not the chicken kind). Did I miss the mark on something? Questions? TJ. Preamp vs. Interface. Required fields are marked *, “As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.”, “Stu is determined to help you make sound decisions, and strives to deliver the best and most in depth content on the internet! Despite the cheap price of the mic, the Audix i5 is known to pack quite a number of features that easily make it stand out.

.

Ac3 Clock Puzzle, Paneer Tikka Recipe, Bhojohori Manna, Gariahat Menu, Best Products For Curly Frizzy Hair, Philosophy Of Science Essay, Boston Police Ranks, Lenovo Laptop 8gb Ram 1tb Hard Drive,